| Chrysler + GM = Fail ? | |
|
+6El Carto jamie.3030 coady-admin iCivic hocus_focus Boost_Junkie 10 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Boost_Junkie Moderator
Posts : 1053 Join date : 2008-01-30
| Subject: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:34 am | |
| Merging together ? its what i heard .. anyone got any info on this ? | |
|
| |
hocus_focus
Posts : 640 Join date : 2008-01-25 Age : 41 Location : Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:09 am | |
| see this is what i dont get about this whole deal when diamler got ahold of chrysler they lost 15% margin so now that chrysler and gm are merging they are both in total loss gm just asked the federal gov in the us for 5 billion dollars so that they coul aquire chrysler.
so yes gm+chrysler= epic fail | |
|
| |
iCivic Moderator
Posts : 1985 Join date : 2008-01-27 Age : 35 Location : Blowing up turbos
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:46 am | |
| something got posted about this a little while back..prolly bout a week ago...GM sold the remaining 50% of their own stocks to Chrysler. It was only in the financial sector of it..a merger...but it was a different division of GM as far as i remember... | |
|
| |
coady-admin Admin
Posts : 1371 Join date : 2007-12-29 Age : 33 Location : yarmouth ns
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:54 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
jamie.3030
Posts : 492 Join date : 2008-01-05 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:33 pm | |
| why in the fuck would it fail? | |
|
| |
El Carto
Posts : 262 Join date : 2008-05-22
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:34 pm | |
| clearly a fail | |
|
| |
jamie.3030
Posts : 492 Join date : 2008-01-05 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:36 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
coady-admin Admin
Posts : 1371 Join date : 2007-12-29 Age : 33 Location : yarmouth ns
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:10 am | |
| gm just wanted there money because there losing so much money a month that they cant keep up. So now there just gonna keep losing money and the money chrsytler had, unless things soon turn around. | |
|
| |
hocus_focus
Posts : 640 Join date : 2008-01-25 Age : 41 Location : Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:31 am | |
| see the thing is that gm must first get rid of all the little companies that are making them go bust first then they probably wouldnt be in such of a mess look of the list they own Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GM Daewoo, GMC, Holden, Hummer, Opel, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Vauxhall, and Wuling compared to daimler who owns only mercedes,maybach, part of mitsubishi, Freighliner,Smart, and until 2008 chrysler part of Cerberus now and compared to Ford who owns mercury(still not sure if they may cancel it in the states) lincoln,Mazda and volvo(they just recently sold jaguar , and landrover to Tata motors in india.Aston martin is actaully in the plans of being rebought by mercedes right now). Gm is doing so poorly they have canceled all SUv production for the end of 2009. And have also bailed out contract for the nascar truck series at the end of this year . so this is not good times for gm right now | |
|
| |
DubAllStar
Posts : 323 Join date : 2008-01-27 Age : 40 Location : Windsor, NS
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:01 pm | |
| FYI Daimler has nothing to do with chrysler... they spun them off almost a year ago due to the financial burden. | |
|
| |
hocus_focus
Posts : 640 Join date : 2008-01-25 Age : 41 Location : Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:05 pm | |
| - PhotoShark wrote:
compared to daimler who owns only mercedes,maybach, part of mitsubishi, Freighliner,Smart, and until 2008 chrysler part of Cerberus now
it was early 2008 so stated on wiki | |
|
| |
Boost_Junkie Moderator
Posts : 1053 Join date : 2008-01-30
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:54 pm | |
| - PhotoShark wrote:
- PhotoShark wrote:
compared to daimler who owns only mercedes,maybach, part of mitsubishi, Freighliner,Smart, and until 2008 chrysler part of Cerberus now
it was early 2008 so stated on wiki you fail | |
|
| |
jamie.3030
Posts : 492 Join date : 2008-01-05 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:17 pm | |
| wiki aint real stuff its people opinions | |
|
| |
hocus_focus
Posts : 640 Join date : 2008-01-25 Age : 41 Location : Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:21 pm | |
| you should take the advice of your avatar man | |
|
| |
ubergeek
Posts : 1090 Join date : 2008-01-04 Location : hot boxin Dubs
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:48 pm | |
| holy fuck....buahhaahaha | |
|
| |
jamie.3030
Posts : 492 Join date : 2008-01-05 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:58 pm | |
| listen pencil neck fuck you gotta back shit up with facts not nerds that have nothing better to do then write shit on websites they dont know.anyone can go on any time and put stuff one there.aint saying its all fake but most of it is.thought id state the obvious
Last edited by jamie.3030 on Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:50 am; edited 2 times in total | |
|
| |
El Carto
Posts : 262 Join date : 2008-05-22
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:24 am | |
| | |
|
| |
iCivic Moderator
Posts : 1985 Join date : 2008-01-27 Age : 35 Location : Blowing up turbos
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:47 am | |
| | |
|
| |
jamie.3030
Posts : 492 Join date : 2008-01-05 Age : 32
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:51 am | |
| already over the first step there why do u think im arguing bout this shit | |
|
| |
iCivic Moderator
Posts : 1985 Join date : 2008-01-27 Age : 35 Location : Blowing up turbos
| |
| |
hocus_focus
Posts : 640 Join date : 2008-01-25 Age : 41 Location : Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:54 am | |
| now the second step is admitting that your a pencil neck fuck nerd that has nothing better to do then write shit on websites. thought I'd state the obvious | |
|
| |
Boost_Junkie Moderator
Posts : 1053 Join date : 2008-01-30
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:05 am | |
| - PhotoShark wrote:
- now the second step is admitting that your a pencil neck fuck nerd that has nothing better to do then write shit on websites. thought I'd state the obvious
thats kinda The Pot Calling The Kettle Black isnt it? im just saying.... you just posted on this website...right ? | |
|
| |
iCivic Moderator
Posts : 1985 Join date : 2008-01-27 Age : 35 Location : Blowing up turbos
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:42 am | |
| - PhotoShark wrote:
- now the second step is admitting that your a pencil neck fuck nerd that has nothing better to do then write shit on websites. thought I'd state the obvious
that fail was EPIC. :albino: | |
|
| |
El Carto
Posts : 262 Join date : 2008-05-22
| |
| |
hocus_focus
Posts : 640 Join date : 2008-01-25 Age : 41 Location : Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:25 pm | |
| to get back on track its hard to defend a north american car manufacture when they create junk and when two big companies make junk and merge together they create bigger junk so thats why i say big fail either gm is going to waste there time and money they dont have and kick the bucket now or they leave Chrysler to kick the bucket alone | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Chrysler + GM = Fail ? | |
| |
|
| |
| Chrysler + GM = Fail ? | |
|