| | 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) |    |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
iCivic
Moderator
Posts: 1963
Join date: 2008-01-28
Age: 20
Location: Blowing up turbos
 |  Subject: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO)  Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:27 pm | |
|
Last edited by iCiviC on Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
 | |
Munky
Admin
Posts: 659
Join date: 2008-01-26
Age: 29
Location: Y-town
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:50 pm | |
| fail _________________ Mine - 2005 Jetta GLI - APR Stage 3+Hers - 2006 Passat Comfortline 2.0t |
|
| | |
Sweetland
Posts: 1329
Join date: 2008-01-01
Age: 18
Location: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:52 pm | |
|
X2, Chris your still burnt, go to bed lol.
_________________
2003 Tiburon SE - Bone Stock.
1997 Jetta GLX VR6 - Tucked Away.
|
|
| | |
Jareddent666
Posts: 95
Join date: 2009-08-01
Age: 19
Location: West Pubnico
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:27 am | |
| is there supposed to be a pic or is chris just burnt out? |
|
| | |
hocus_focus
Posts: 636
Join date: 2008-01-25
Age: 27
Location: Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:10 pm | |
| you just answered your own question _________________  |
|
| | |
Jareddent666
Posts: 95
Join date: 2009-08-01
Age: 19
Location: West Pubnico
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:47 pm | |
| now that hes sober we can finally see it... And that is FUCKED... I thought FOR SURE the 59 would survive because well... its as big as a fucking boat and weights about double the 09 does. I guess looks are deceiving |
|
| | |
98talon
Posts: 209
Join date: 2008-02-04
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:59 pm | |
| car was weakened for this if u notice bolts are missing from certin items |
|
| | |
iCivic
Moderator
Posts: 1963
Join date: 2008-01-28
Age: 20
Location: Blowing up turbos
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:04 pm | |
| of course bolts are missing..you see the impact? |
|
| | |
hocus_focus
Posts: 636
Join date: 2008-01-25
Age: 27
Location: Yarmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
| | |
jamie.3030
Posts: 492
Join date: 2008-01-05
Age: 18
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:30 pm | |
| of course parts are missing its a gm they just proved they are missing since 1957 fuck your such a douche! |
|
| | |
suckallotofdick
Posts: 368
Join date: 2008-06-17
Age: 22
Location: Y-Town
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:18 pm | |
| Smoke another one burnout |
|
| | |
ubergeek
Posts: 1075
Join date: 2008-01-04
Location: hot boxin Dubs
| | Subject: Re: 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:14 pm | |
| actually boys, that Bel Air is all fenders and a low gay-ass subframe that houses a pretty decent motor for '59. A high enough impact would result in the firewall being your last line of defense. The shit comes in fast and close. Visualize it. The fuckin steering wheel alone is tearing up your innards let alone the other vehicle bypassing the low sub frame...comin straight at ya..... pics for reference... 1955 Chevy  1969 Camaro  1978 Camaro  2010 yo  it's obvious we learn from our own mistakes and rebuild on it... take note of the higher impact zones that would absorb the impact much much more
_________________
07 VW GTI 2.0T | 3" APR dp | Milltek cb | Koni | Karthoums | Votex | Forge | EvoMS | APR Tuned™
[]D [] []v[] []D
|
|
| | |
| | 1957 vs 2009 Malibu head on (NOW WITH VIDEO) | |
|
